The Power of One September 22, 2009
Long Island Nurses Rally Against Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine September 21, 2009
Dangers of Flu Mist September 18, 2009
* More than 8.5 million people have cancer. [12]
* There are reported to be 850,000 individuals with diagnosed and undiagnosed HIV infection or AIDS [13] and
* Based on 2001 data, there were 184,000 organ recipients [14] An even more extensive list of at-risk people includes the untold millions on drugs called corticosteroids. Prednisone®, Medrol®, and a variety of similar medications are given to both adults and children. These drugs are prescribed for dozens of conditions including asthma; allergies; eczema; emphysema; Crohn’s disease; multiple sclerosis; herniated spinal discs; acute muscular pain syndromes; and all types of rheumatoid and autoimmune diseases. As much as 60% of the entire population could be considered to be “chemically immunosuppressed.” It is important to realize that FluMist is CONTRAINDICATED for people who are immunocompromised. People who receive FluMist and are living with an immunocompromised person put their loved ones at risk. Will this make stores that administer the vaccineslike Walmart and the other pharmaceutical chain stores that have announced they will carry FluMist [15]risky places to shop for large segments of the population? What measures will be taken in these stores to ensure that the virus will not become commingled with food? What hand washing policy is going to be enforced in the stores for all Walmart employees and customers who have received FluMist? These are reasonable questions that deserve answers. The target market for FluMist is “healthy children and adults, ages 5 to 49 yrs.” Some believe that by vaccinating these people, a type of “herd immunity” will occur that will protect the very young and the elderly who are excluded from getting this vaccine. However, it is these very “at-risk” populations who may suffer the most from the flu by being exposed to people who are given FluMist. According to information presented at the May, 2003 National Influenza Summit,[16] approximately 85% of Americans between the ages of 20 and 50 go unvaccinated, and nearly 66% between the ages of 50 and 64 do not receive the flu vaccine. Have there been “raging epidemics” across the country due to lack of flu vaccinations? It appears that the massive campaign to vaccinate everyone this year appears may be motivated, in part, by economics. The viruses suspected to be the most likely cause for the flu this season were negligibly different from the strains used in last year’s flu vaccine. Therefore, the influenza vaccine produced for the 2003-2004 season is identical in composition to the one used last year. This marks only the second time that the same strains have been used during two consecutive flu seasons.[17] Consider that antibodies from other viral vaccinessuch as MMR, polio and chickenpox vaccineslast at least 3 years, and in some instances, up to 15 years. If the viruses used in the vaccine are the same as last year, why is this year’s vaccine even necessary? An ever greater concern about FluMist is the contents within the vaccine. Each 0.5ml of the formula contains 10 6.5-7.5 particles of live, attenuated influenza virus. That means that between 10 million and 100 million viral particles will be forcefully injected into the nostrils when administered. The viral strain was developed by serial passage through “specific pathogen-free primary chick kidney cells” and then grown in “specific pathogen-free eggs.” That means that the culture media was free of pathogens that were specifically tested for, but not a culture that was necessarily “pathogen-free.” The risk that the vaccine may contain contaminant avian retroviruses still remains. In addition, a stabilizing buffer containing potassium phosphate, sucrose (table sugar) and nearly 0.5 mg of monosodium glutamate (MSG) is added to each dose. [18] One of the most troubling concerns over the injection of this “chemical soup” is the potential for the viruses to enter directly into the brain.. At the top of the nasal passages is a paper-thin bone called the cribriform plate. The olfactory nerves pass through this bone and line the nasal passages, carrying messenger molecules to the brain that are identified as “smells” familiar to us. The olfactory tract has long been recognized as a direct pathway to the brain. Intranasal injection of certain viruses has resulted in a serious brain infection called encephalitis, presumably by direct infection of the olfactory neurons that carried the viruses to the brain.[19] Time will tell whether the live viruses in FluMist will become linked to cases of encephalitis. The pharmaceutical companies do not necessarily always do a reasonable job of considering the “down side” when they are pushing new drugs or new vaccines. FluMist has the potential for causing the worst, most severe flu epidemic seen in years. Parents tell their young children not to put things up their noses because they might cause them harm. It would be wise to consider that advice for adults. With all the risks involved, one should be extremely cautious about what one allows to be sprayed in one’s nose. REFERENCES 1. DowJones Business News. Sept. 12, 2003. FluMist Available In Pharmacies This Fall.
2. Washington Post. Nasal spray for flu to get big media launch. Sept. 10, 2003, pg. E01
3. Washington Post. Spray vaccine for flu wins FDA clearance. June 18, 2003. pg. A01.
4. Mohammed, Madjid. Influenza as a bioweapon. J.R.Soc.Med. 2003;96:345-346.
5. Adler, Neil. MedImmune awaits the $1 billion mark and a new flu drug. The Business Gazette. Feb. 7, 2003.
6. FluMist package insert.
7. Vesikari T., et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlledtrial of the safety, transmissibility and phenotypic stability of a live, attenuated, cold-adapted influenza virus vaccine (CAIV-T) in children attending day care. Presented at the 41st Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, (Chicago, IL). 2001
8. ibid. (Chicago, IL). 2001
9. Zangwell, Kenneth. Cold-adapted, live attenuated intranasal influenza virus vaccine. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2003; 22(3):273-274.
10. Drug information.
11. Diepgen TL. Is the prevalence of atopic dermatitis increasing? In: Williams HC, ed. Atopic Dermatitis: The Epidemiology, Causes and Prevention of Atopic Eczema. New York: Cambridge Univ Pr; 2000:96-112.
12. National Cancer Institute. CanQues. Available at http://srab. cancer.gov/Prevalence/canques.html. Accessed January 3, 2002.
13. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Epidemiological Fact Sheets on HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections: United States. Available at http://www.unaids.org/ fact_sheets/index.html. Accessed January 14, 2002
14. United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). All Recipients: Age at Time of Transplant. Available at http://www.unos.org /. Accessed January 14, 2002.
15. Allan and Harold Rubin, MS, ABD, CRC. September 26, 2003. Vaccinations and the Elderly..
16. May 20-21, 2003, the National Influenza Summit. Chicago, IL..
17. ibid.
18. FluMist package insert.
19. Knipe, David. M. Ed. Fields Virology. Philadelpthis: Lippincott, 4th ed. 2001. pg. 1057
E.C.H.O.
Educating on Children’s Health Options
www.TheEchoFoundation.com
ECHO the truth.
Be a voice for your child
18 Reasons Not to Give Your Kids the Flu Vaccine September 16, 2009
E.C.H.O.
Educating on Children’s Health Options
www.TheEchoFoundation.com
ECHO the truth.
Be a voice for your child
knew this was coming. September 11, 2009
E.C.H.O.
Educating on Children’s Health
Options
www.TheEchoFoundation.com
ECHO the truth.
Be a voice for your child
Canadian conference to expose truth September 9, 2009
E.C.H.O.
Educating on Children’s Health Options
www.TheEchoFoundation.com
ECHO the truth.
Be a voice for your child
medical vs chiropractic, homeopathy and osteopathy September 3, 2009
Hippocrates, the “father of medicine” understood this well as he said: “Diseases are crises of purification, of toxic elimination. Symptoms are the natural defenses of the body. We call them diseases, but in fact they are the cure of diseases.” The famous medical historian Dr. Harris L. Coulter, Ph.D. viewed our “catching” infectious illness, whether flu or measles as ultimately beneficial. “Contracting and overcoming childhood diseases are part of a developmental process that actually helps develop a healthy, robust, adult immune system able to meet the challenges that inevitable encounters with viruses and bacteria will present later on.” Coulter HL. Vaccination, Social Violence and Criminality: The Medical Assault on the American Brain. Washington, DC: Center for Empirical Medicine. 1990. More recent papers reveal that, among its other benefits, acute illness protects against cancer. One fascinating paper reported: “The study consistently revealed a lower cancer risk for patients with a history of febrile infectious childhood diseases.” Albonico HU, Braker HU, Husler J. Febrile infectious childhood diseases in the history of cancer patients and matched controls. Medical Hypotheses. 1998;51(4):315-320.
Other researchers have found that getting colds and flu bringing protection from cancer: “Researchers interviewed those with carcinomas of the stomach, colon, rectum, breast, and ovary and reported, “A history of common colds or influenza prior to the interview was found to be associated with a decreased cancer risk.” Abel U, Becker N, Angerer R et al. Common infections in the history of cancer patients and controls. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1991;117(4);339-344.
But these days people ask “How can I “fight” the flu?” I need to remind them that that this antagonistic approach was done in the past with horrible consequences. We don’t have to curse the darkness, we need to light a candle. Let’s look at history. The flu plague of 1918-19 took 500,000 American lives and over 30 million lives worldwide. However, most of the deaths were found to be due to bacterial infections, not the flu. Keith P. Klugman, Christina Mills Astley, and Marc Lipsitch. Time from Illness Onset to Death, 1918 Influenza and Pneumococcal Pneumonia. Emerging Infectious Diseaes. Volume 15, Number 2 February 2009
The horrific medical mortality rate
Why such a terrible death rate under medical care? Most all the deaths appeared to occur not in spite of medical care, but because of medical care. Look at these statistics of the mortality rate under medical care: n The mortality rate in US military hospitals averaged 36%. n The mortality rate in US medical hospitals was 30%- 40%, n A mortality rate of 68% was in New York City hospitals.Patterson MM. Osteopathic methods and the great flu pandemic of 1917-1918. J Am Osteopath Assoc.2000; 100:309 -310. The chiropractic, osteopathic, homeopathic mortality rate
Under traditional osteopathy, chiropractic and homeopathy practicing MDs, the death rate was negligible. For example, here is an osteopathic report:
n 2445 osteopaths treating 110,122 patients with influenza reported a mortality of 0.25%. n The 400-bed Mass Osteopathic Hospital, in Boston, also reported a mortality of 0.25%. Walter GW. The First School of Osteopathic Medicine. Kirksville, Mo: The Thomas Jefferson University Press at Northeast Missouri State University; 1992:95 .
Similarly chiropractors reported saving nearly every patient:
n Davenport, Iowa: MDs lost one patient out of every 15 (6,116 deaths from 93,590 patients) while Chiropractors at the Palmer School of Chiropractic in Davenport, Iowa had but one death out of 1,635 cases of the flu. n Iowa Doctors of Chiropractic reported 1 death out of 866. Rhodes WR: “The Official History of Chiropractic in Texas.” Texas Chiropractic Association. Austin, TX. 1978.and “Chiropractic Statistics.” The Chiropractic Research and Review Service. Burton Shields Press. Indianapolis, IN. 1925. Those medical doctors practicing homeopathy reported great success:
- “In a plant of 8,000 workers we had only one death. The patients were not drugged to death. Gelsemium was practically the only remedy used. We used no aspirin and no vaccines.” Frank Wieland, MD
- “I did not lose a single case of influenza; my death rate in the pneumonias was 2.1%. Aspirin and quinine were almost the sole standbys of the old school and it was a common thing to hear them speaking of losing 60% of their pneumonias.” Dudley A. Williams, MD. Winston J. Influenza-1918: Homeopathy to the Rescue. The New England Journal of Homeopathy. Spring/Summer 1998, Vol.7 No.1 http://www.nesh.com/main/nejh/samples/winston.html
Regular MDs treated patients with fever reducers such as aspirin while the homeopathic MDs, osteopaths and chiropractors refused to suppress the patients’ fevers and other symptoms. Further the osteopaths, chiropractors and homeopaths employed natural methods to promote the patient’s natural healing response. As homeopathic practitioner Frank Newton, MD reported: “There is one drug which directly or indirectly was the cause of the loss of more lives than was influenza itself: aspirin. Aspirin was taken until prostration resulted and the patient developed pneumonia.” Frank L. Newton, MD, Somerville, Massachusetts, Winston J. Influenza-1918: Homeopathy to the Rescue. The New England Journal of Homeopathy. Spring/Summer 1998, Vol.7 No.1 http://www.nesh.com/main/nejh/samples/winston.html We see this today in the reporting of swine flu deaths. Almost all of the deaths are in individuals under medical care who have underlying health conditions. Medical care is suppressive and with the aggressive use of even more powerful suppressive drugs today than in 1918 (antibiotics, steroids and others) the mortality may again be higher for those under medical care compared to healthcare practitioners who respect the wisdom of the body and work with the body to promote health and healing. With the above in mind let us remember that In most all cases the flu should run its course. n Patients should be comforted. n Get lots of sun and eat nutrient dense foods now. n Expressive healthcare is superior to suppressive healthcare. n Suppressive medical care (antibiotics, fever reducers, other drugs and vaccinations) can make the illness far worse. n Chiropractic, traditional osteopathy, homeopathy, acupuncture, naturopathy and other “natural” healthcare systems n Avoid refined and non-organic foods. n The flu for most is a temporary inconvenience that leaves a less toxic, healthier person in its wake.
Remember, the goal of healing is not to give temporary relief by suppressing symptoms and driving them deeper in to the body where they may give rise to chronic illness in the future.
The goal of healing is to permit the patient to express his/her symptoms and respect the natural self-healing ability of the body. True healing is long-term healing.
Vaccine Exemptions
P.O. Box 3473
Chapel Hill, NC 27515-3473
919-960-5172
www.vaccinerights.com
foolish me September 1, 2009
E.C.H.O.
Educating on Children’s Health
Options
www.TheEchoFoundation.com
ECHO the truth.
Be a voice for your child
mom cures son
E.C.H.O.
Educating on Children’s Health Options
www.TheEchoFoundation.com
ECHO the truth.
Be a voice for your child
Recent Comments